Then perhaps it needs to be more structured like the judging and we start off with this as being a Quarterly meeting and if participation and demand continue we bump it up. We would also need a volunteer to help facilitate these meetings. I think they would be widely user driven but someone would still need to make sure they organize the meeting topic and place.
From: BrewHound [mailto:
brew-events@crbeernuts.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 9:29 PM
To: brew-events@crbeernuts.org
Subject: Re: Any Interest in a 2nd education Monthly Meeting?
That would most likely eleminate anything other that tastings, such as DIY events. As they take up sustantially more time. That would also eliminate judging beers because that would require filling out BJCP score sheets. Which is why the judgings were removed from the meeting in the first place.
I think you are seriously under estimating both aspects. There were several of us talking at Matts house at the last meeting. I made an off handed remark as joke stating that is why I come to the meeting because the great beers that some of the guys bring. I was shot down quite rapidly that the reason most are there is to socialize with their brewing brothers. This was my experience with my previous club as well. The larger of the two meetings was always the social/agenda meeting. The Tuesday meeting was usually between 5 - 10 people. I will continue to poll the data and the board can then at least make an informed decision on the topic.
Mr T wrote:
My biggest concern would be attendance. I would be concerned the folks showing up to the first tasting would tend not to show up to the general meeting. Have a tasting as a sub meeting might work best, but people would have to be serious about making it happen as in the past we have learned that folks get easily distracted.
From: BrewHound [mailto:
brew-events@crbeernuts.org]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 7:54 PM
To: brew-events@crbeernuts.org (
brew-events@crbeernuts.org)
Subject: Re: Any Interest in a 2nd education Monthly Meeting?
That is my concerns about doing it at the meeting. If we were to do this on the regular meeting night about the only way it would work is if it happen first before anything else (before we get into the beer). My other concerns would be providing enought isolation from those who are not interested in the event/demonstration to keep it on task as well as time contraints. As stated some of the ones my other club had ran upwards 2 1/2 hours. That with the regular meeting would eat up all the time and provide no social time. The final large reason is to intice people who only want the learning aspect and not to be near drunk people.
However once the poll reveils enough demand I will start another to determine whether the club wants it broken off or the regular meeting devided.
Sent from Jeremy Orchuk's iPhone!
On Mar 22, 2010, at 7:21 PM, "tompb"
brew-events@crbeernuts.org (
brew-events@crbeernuts.org))> wrote:
: I think it's a great idea. I don't know why we couldn't do it during a regular meeting though. A normal meeting runs long enough we could do a couple hours structured and then have social time. It would be more of an issue of having an area were everyone could sit in a group. I think that way it would be easier to control the bar mentality we get into during most of the meeting. Let's get more input.
Runamok Brewing
Jesus must have been a yeast. Who else could turn water into wine?
Post generated using Mail2Forum (
http://www.mail2forum.com)